News flash (NOT!): eating unhealthy food is bad for you. While that is not exactly revolutionary, there is still a lot we don’t know, like exactly how diet affects different bacteria of the human biome. Thus, I am reporting to you an interesting study published in the eminent journal, Gut, that was conducted by Dutch scientists.[i] The study involved a large sample of people, 1425, and the results show that there is a consistent association between pro-inflammatory bacteria in the gut and diets that are high in processed foods, sugar, and animal products.
550 of the subjects suffered from inflammatory bowel disease or irritable bowel syndrome; the rest were healthy: “We investigated the relation between 173 dietary factors and the microbiome of 1425 individuals spanning four cohorts: Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome and the general population.” They found 38 associations between diet and microbial clusters, and 61 individual foods or nutrients that were associated with 61 species (and 249 metabolic pathways): “Processed foods and animal-derived foods were consistently associated with higher abundances of Firmicutes, Ruminococcus species of the Blautia genus and endotoxin synthesis pathways.” Not surprisingly, plant food and fish were associated with the production of anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) via probiotic species of bacteria.
A few interesting specifics for you:
To sum up the findings of this study, “… habitual dietary choices can impact the human gut ecosystem and its inflammatory potential by studying the relations between unsupervised dietary patterns, intestinal inflammatory markers and gut microbial composition and function across four cohorts. We identified significant associations that replicate across patients with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome and the general population, implying a potential for microbiome-targeted dietary strategies to alleviate and prevent intestinal inflammation.”
So for the millionth time…eat right!
[i] Bolte LA, Vich Vila A, Imhann F, et al. Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome. Gut Published Online First: 02 April 2021. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322670
Some might say it’s self-flagellation, but I can’t help myself reading the latest research into the effects of antibiotics early in life. By now, my regular readers are all-too-familiar with my son, Alex’s, history. For those new to The Biome Buzz, Alex is diagnosed with autism and was very physically ill much of his life. He was put onto 5 days of IV antibiotics at 36 hours old when he developed a fever, and immediately I noted differences in him from other babies. It turned out the antibiotics were entirely unnecessary: he was released without any diagnosis. No bacterial infection was found. I am not one to oversimplify things: I am perfectly aware of the fact that this was not a one-shot insult that resulted in his autism. But research over the last decade and half as all pointed in one direction: early introduction of antibiotics – while potentially life-saving – has major repercussions on the gut biome and brain development.
A new paper just came out of the University of Minnesota that is worth reporting to you. I was shocked by the paper’s opening sentence: “According to current estimates, ~10% of all newborns in the United States are treated with antibiotics immediately after birth, with many of these exposures being unnecessary.”[i] TEN PERCENT?! And then we wonder why there is an exponential increase in autism, ADHD and related disorders?! We know that antibiotic exposure during childhood has been linked now to an increased risk for obesity, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease, and more. (I have written about this topic many times. Look here and here, for just 2 examples.)
Animals studies show that the subsequent alteration to the gut biome leads to alterations in brain function: both cognition and behavioral changes are seen. In particular, the hippocampus seems vulnerable. This part of the brain is critical to recognition memory and cognitive function. These researchers actually studied the effects of very early antibiotic exposure on human infants: one of the only studies ever to have done so. They used a type of EEG called event related potentials (ERPs) to measure how babies exposed to antibiotics within the first month of life respond to their mothers’ voices versus strangers’ voices, in comparison to unexposed control infants. Using this technique, they could measure “recognition memory.” The lead researcher explains that, “Recognition memory is one of the earliest types of explicit memory to develop and is known to be dependent on medial temporal lobe structures, including the hippocampus, the brain region affected by microbiome perturbation in animal models…”[ii] 72 infants in total were included in the study, 15 of which were antibiotic-exposed, 57 were controls.
Their findings: “…infants exposed to antibiotics soon after birth who are otherwise healthy following a negative evaluation for sepsis have altered auditory processing and discrimination at 1 month of age. Infants in this antibiotic-exposed cohort represent an at-risk group…” While no one denies that there are cases in which antibiotics are absolutely necessary, “…efforts are ongoing to improve antibiotic stewardship…” The goal is to reduce use to only cases in which it is absolutely essential, and also, to develop treatments to alleviate the negative consequences of that necessary use. The authors conclude that “…our study shows that infants exposed to antibiotics during the birth hospitalization, and subsequently ‘ruled-out’ for infection, demonstrate altered attentional perceptual discrimination responses at 1 month of age. While this group of infants was exposed to several risk factors, the observed changes in perceptual encoding provide support for the hypothesis that a healthy gut microbiota–brain axis contributes to brain development.”
Please don’t walk way after having read this thinking that this is THE cause of developmental issues. Notice the authors specifically state that the babies were exposed to several risk factors. As just one example, diet: it is already known that babies fed breast milk, as opposed to formula, demonstrate “…faster speeds of processing for both auditory and visual stimuli…” (In this study, all the babies were essentially fed the same so diet was not a factor.) There is almost certainly not any ONE reason: however, there is really overwhelming evidence that early exposure to antibiotics is highly detrimental. I look forward to, in the future, reading more about how we can remediate it.
[i] Hickey MK, Miller NC, Haapala J, Demerath EW, Pfister KM, Georgieff MK, Gale CA. Infants exposed to antibiotics after birth have altered recognition memory responses at one month of age. Pediatr Res. 2020 Sep 12:10.1038/s41390-020-01117-7. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-01117-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32919394; PMCID: PMC7952463.
I have been following the research into Parkinson’s disease for years, having been forced to watch the inevitable physical decline in several friends now who developed the illness frighteningly early in life (40s and 50s). See here and here for just a couple of examples. I keep hoping that with the significant advancements scientists seem to have made in recognizing the causes, more effective treatments are not that far in the future. And thus, today’s post.
I’ve had a paper sitting on my desk for several months which I have only just found time to read, and the first sentence alone is so upsetting that it almost went unread for another few months! The paper reports that the global prevalence of the disease is expected to increase by 92% by 2050.[i] With over 6 million people in the world already suffering from the illness by 2016, that is a depressing statistic.
Since only 3-5% of PD cases are genetic in origin: “Over the past years, researchers have published significant numbers of papers which suggests that the motor effects the progressive degeneration and loss of preferential dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra seen in PD patients, might be related to factors other than a predominantly genetic cause.” Research has focused on the link between increase iron and copper levels found in PD patients (both systemically and in the brain), the role of the microbiome, and dysregulated inflammatory markers (including those originating from bacteria).
The authors of this paper present the argument that PD is associated with both dysregulated circulating inflammagens (an irritant that causes inflammation) including ones released by gut bacteria, leading to the conclusion that dysbiosis may be central in the development of the disease. Thus, they argue, the way to treat PD is to find the reason for this immune activation: “We argue that this origin is microbial…central to its cause might be microbiome dysregulation, translocation, and comorbidities including periodontitis and gingivitis.” This was the first time I had read about gum diseases being associated with the onset of PD. (Coincidentally, just this morning, I also posted on my Biome Buzz’ Facebook page research associating gum diseases and bacteria to Alzheimer’s.)
This was also the first time I had read about iron dysregulation in the disease. Apparently it occurs in both the brain and in circulation, and prior research has shown that those with PD have iron dysregulation issues including in storage, uptake and release and this is known to be a major cause of oxidative stress. Both male and female PD patients have significantly increased ferritin (stored iron) levels and this was correlated with PD severity stages and duration. Iron dysregulation in the sustantia nigra is “…considered one of the fundamental reasons for dopaminergic neurons dysfunction and death.” So what is causing this dysregulation of iron metabolism in the body? “The origin of dysregulated circulating inflammatory biomarkers could therefore involve bacteria, and particularly their inflammagens, entering the body via gut dysbiosis and translocation(when microbes appear in places other than their normal location).”
So where does PD start? No one knows for sure yet but we do know that, “Parkinson’s disease patients have a significantly higher incidence of comorbid gastrointestinal dysfunction, with between 60% and 80% of patients suffering from constipation and intestinal inflammation. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is, therefore, a very well-known accompaniment to PD and also precedes the onset of motor symptoms by several years.” I have talked about this in other posts such as those I link to above. We know that gram-negative bacteria like E.coli and H.pylori secrete a variety of pro-inflammatory molecules which can act as neurotoxins. Another point of entry for pathogenic bacteria is diseased gums: “One of the Gram-negative bacteria that has been implicated as a causative agent in periodontitis and gingivitis is Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), and its inflammagens have been associated with the development of various inflammatory conditions.It is mainly a bacterium from the mouth, however, after oral administration in animal studies, it may also induce gut dysbiosis and impaired gut barrier function, and can induce systemic inflammation.” Retrospective studies show that there is an increased risk of developing PD after having chronic periodontal inflammatory diseases.
So does all this lead to any therapeutic possibilities? Iron chelation with a drug called deferiprone has shown some “…promising efficacy with regard to neurodegeneration.” However, there are really no longitudinal clinical data that shows efficacy in slowing disease progression: trials that have been conducted were small and only 6 month long, and worse, deferiprone is considered only a weak chelator. Better medicines and larger and longer trials are urgently needed.
There are no definitive studies on the use of antibiotics or probiotics in PD. One study did show that probiotics may alter clinical progression of the illness and could alleviate constipation and gut-related issues, but we don’t have nearly enough information yet. And antibiotic treatments have really only focused on alleviating constipation and gut dysbiosis. One promising treatment though is the antibiotic, minocycline, which also has been shown to be anti-inflammatory in the brain: “…there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that minocycline elicits neuroprotective effects in PD…” Fecal transplant is also suggested to be a treatment, but again, we are in the very early stages of knowing how best to use this. Animal studies look promising but controlled trials are needed.
The authors conclude that, “Targeting underlying mechanisms of PD, such as gut dysbiosis and iron toxicity, have elucidated a wide variety of novel treatments, which could not only relieve the characteristic motor deficits seen in PD but also might significantly slow the progression of the disease.” Unfortunately, it feels like I always have to conclude these posts with the statement that way more clinical trials are necessary before we know for sure if these treatments will work and how to use them for optimal efficacy.
[i] Vuuren MJV, Nell TA, Carr JA, Kell DB, Pretorius E. Iron Dysregulation and Inflammagens Related to Oral and Gut Health Are Central to the Development of Parkinson’s Disease. Biomolecules. 2020 Dec 29;11(1):30. doi: 10.3390/biom11010030. PMID: 33383805; PMCID: PMC7823713.
As you know, I like to keep up on research on all the different components of the human biome, so yesterday, I read an article in the International Journal of Medial Microbiology about fungi.[i] There were a bunch of really interesting facts which I’ll bullet point for you.
The authors point out that we desperately need research into the mycobiome to answer both the question of what belongs there and what do these organisms actually do there. We know very little at this point. But it was news to me that C.albicans – which I’d always thought of as a pathogen (who hasn’t heard of the nightmarish “yeast infection”?) may actually have a whole other beneficial side to it. I find myself, yet again (for about the billionth time), amazed at the complexity of the human biome.
[i] Pérez JC. Fungi of the human gut microbiota: Roles and significance. Int J Med Microbiol. 2021 Apr;311(3):151490. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151490. Epub 2021 Feb 25. PMID: 33676239.
Today’s post is about interesting research out of the University of Southern California, UCLA and the University of Georgia, looking at the relationship of sugary drinks early in life to cognitive issues later on.[i] Here’s a fact that I didn’t know: according to the CDC, sugary beverages are the leading source of added sugar in Americans’ diets and nearly 2/3rds of young people in the country consume at least 1 of these drinks every day.[ii] Astounding, right?
The scientists gave adolescent rats unlimited access to sugar-sweetened beverages, proportionally comparable to what humans drink in both sugar content and calories. When the rats grew to adulthood, their memories were tested using different methods: one test looked at memory associated with the hippocampus and the other looked at memory associated with a brain region called the perirhinal cortex. The hippocampus is known for its “…role in spatial and episodic memory, as well as for learned and social aspects of food intake control…” and is thought to be “…particularly vulnerable to the deleterious effects of Western dietary factors.”
They found that compared to controls, the rats that consumed the sugary drink scored much worse on memory tests involving the hippocampal region: “During the juvenile and adolescent stages of development, a time when the brain is rapidly developing, consumption of diets high in saturated fat and sugar or sugar alone impairs hippocampal function”
But wait, there’s more. The researchers then took a look at the bacterial microbiome composition of the rodents and found some major differences. The sugar-drinking rats had bigger populations of two particular species, Parabacteroides distasonis and Parabacteroides johnsonii.
They took this information to the logical next step: without drinking sugar, could these bacterial species on their own affect the hippocampal memory? The scientists grew the species in their labs and then transplanted them into adolescent rats that drank plain water. Sure enough, the rats that got these transplants showed memory impairment in the hippocampus as adults. What’s really interesting is that these “transplant rats,” as opposed to the ones who drank sugary beverages, had memory impairments in the perirhinal cortex as well, clearly demonstrating that gut bacterial alterations can affect brain function: “These findings are consistent with previous literature in showing that early life consumption of Western dietary factors impairs neurocognitive outcomes, and further suggest that altered gut bacteria due to excessive early life sugar consumption may functionally link dietary patterns with cognitive impairment.”
In both the “transplant” rats, and the ones who actually drank sugary beverages, the scientists found that gene activity changed in those that control how nerve cells transmit electrical signals to other nerve cells.
The researchers plan to test, in future work, whether or not switching to a healthier diet can reverse this harm to memory caused by early consumption of high levels of sugar. In the meantime, this is – pun intended – some serious food for thought.
I’ll lay off the prebiotics for today, and give you something completely different, to start off this new month.
We all know by now about the bi-directional relationship between the brain and the gut. I’ve talked about it plenty of times on this blog, in relation to depression, stress, anxiety, PTSD, autism, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and more. Today, I’m reporting on research out of the University of California which looked at the relationship between loneliness, wisdom and the bacterial microbiome.[i]
Let me give myself a pat on the back here. Back in June, 2018, I wrote a post about healthy aging and the microbiome. Since we’re all getting older, it’s a topic that I follow pretty closely! Anyway, the paper I talked about in that post was about risk factors for developing age-related illnesses. After I went through what the paper listed, I wrote, “One factor the article does not mention that I would be willing to bet is a huge factor in the elderly is loneliness.” I then described a paper I’d read recently on how loneliness is associated with an increased risk of mortality. It doesn’t surprise me: humans are social beings and isolation is a massive form of stress. As the author’s of today’s paper start off by saying, “Loneliness and wisdom have opposite effects on health and well-being. Loneliness is a serious public health problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality.”
So back to today’s paper: these researchers note that wisdom has been shown to be associated with health and well-being, and that they have consistently found a strong negative association between loneliness and wisdom. (Wisdom, they define, as a “multifaceted human characteristic with affective (or compassionate), reflective, and cognitive dimensions.” Included in this, they list empathy and acts of compassion, self-awareness, and a comprehension of the deeper meaning of life events.) Thus, they were curious how this all ties into the status of the gut microbiome…which of course, makes perfect sense.
They surveyed 184 adults, ages 28-97, living in community housing and measured, via self-report, their feelings of loneliness, wisdom, compassion, social support and social engagement. They also collected fecal samples. The results will come as a surprise to exactly no one: the lower the level of loneliness and the higher the level of social support, compassion, wisdom and social engagement, the greater the richness and diversity of the gut bacteria.
The gut microbiome has already been associated with personality traits such as neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, as well as stress, empathy and emotional well-being. Research has also shown a relationship between the bacterial microbiome and social behavior: we already know that people with larger social networks have more diversity in their gut bacteria.
In their discussion the authors point out that, “It is possible that loneliness may result in decreased stability of the gut microbiome and, consequently, reduced resistance and resilience to stress-related disruptions, leading to downstream physiological effects such as systemic inflammation… Thus, lonely people may be more susceptible to developing different diseases.” Social support, compassion, wisdom then may, “…confer protection against loneliness-related instability of the gut microbiome. Prior evidence suggests that perceived social support may buffer the negative effects of chronic stress on pro-inflammatory markers.”
Of course, as this is a bi-directional relationship, it’s also possible that social behavior is dictated by the gut microbiome. This has been definitevely established in animal studies, but not as yet in humans. Still, the future is promising in terms of being able to treat destructive feelings, like loneliness, by manipulating the microbiome: “This evidence presents the exciting possibility that future ‘psychobiotics’ may be a novel therapeutic option for behaviors like loneliness….the findings represent a step forward in understanding the relationships between the gut microbiome and psychosocial factors that have important consequences for health and well-being.”
[i] Tanya T. Nguyen, Xinlian Zhang, Tsung-Chin Wu, Jinyuan Liu, Collin Le, Xin M. Tu, Rob Knight, Dilip V. Jeste. Association of Loneliness and Wisdom With Gut Microbial Diversity and Composition: An Exploratory Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2021; 12 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648475
I’m on a bit of a fiber kick right now!
A study just came out of the University of California, Irvin, which caught my interest. Did you know that on average, Americans eat way less than 50% of the recommended daily intake of fiber? And that low fiber intake is associated with type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colon cancer? (Well, you knew the colon cancer ‘cause I put up a post on it yesterday on the Biome Buzz Facebook page, which I’m sure you all look at daily…) According to this article, “A profound decrease in the consumption of dietary fiber in many parts of the world in the last century may be associated with the increasing prevalence of type II diabetes, colon cancer, and other health problems. A typical U.S. diet includes about 15g of fiber per day, far less fiber than the daily recommended allowance. Changes in dietary fiber intake affect human health not only through the uptake of nutrients directly but also indirectly through changes in the microbial community and their associated metabolism” [i]
I’ve talked about this multiple times on this blog – how little fiber we consume in the industrialized world compared to preindustrial societies, where people typically consume 60-120 grams per day! I was FLOORED when I read, in this paper, that in one study, exchanging a low-fiber western-type diet in African-Americans for a rural African high fiber diet (at least 40 grams per day of fiber) led to a “significant decrease in precancerous biomarkers.
And how’s this for a timely COVID-pandemic-era fact: did you know that dietary fiber has been shown to protect against influenza? And may influence vaccine efficiency?!
This study was to assess what even a short-term increase in fiber could do for the gut bacteria and metabolite production. The subjects: students in an undergraduate biology course. The subjects were given 10 high fiber meals of unprocessed foods per week for 2 weeks. During this time, they collected stool samples to track the fecal microbiome. The students also recorded all their food consumption including macronutrients; they had to reach a goal of 50 grams of fiber per day during the 2 weeks.
The researchers compared the bacterial composition as well as short-chain fatty acid production, as well as specifically running extra tests to look at levels of Bifidobacterium, which are known fiber degraders. They found that this short intervention significantly altered the gut microbiome, including a sizeable increase in the levels of Bifidobacterium, as well as an increase in Lactobacillus. Prevotella levels, which, as you know are associated with plant-based diets, also increased. They did not, however, detect a change in levels of short-chain fatty acids. Still, the results were dramatic enough that the researchers want to conduct longer tests, and to learn more about how fiber intake can promote good health.
A side note from a summary of this research on News-Medical Net: the comments of the course instructor struck me as particularly interesting – how both she and the students were amazed by what foods were high in fiber, specifically noting berries, avocados, beans and legumes.[ii] The students raised their fiber intake by an average of 25 grams per DAY…and several started from essentially zero grams of fiber per day. According to the professor, in participating in this research the students became extremely interested in what they were eating: “”I think this experience will have a life-long impact on how we all look at nutrition labels.” It’s really a shame how little about nutrition we are taught when we are young.
[i] Andrew Oliver, Alexander., et al. (2021) High-Fiber, Whole-Food Dietary Intervention Alters the Human Gut Microbiome but Not Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acids. mSystems. doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00115-21.
One of the questions I get asked the most by my readers is “what prebiotic and/or probiotic is the best?” Unfortunately, there is no good answer to that because we just don’t have the research to know. To boot, everyone’s body is different. Still, to help you all out as best as I can, I just finished reading a year-old paper on what we know about using prebiotics to treat anxiety, depression and cognitive issues.[i] You’ll never believe it (ha!) but there are not even vaguely enough clinical trials to know how to optimize their use. That said, there are some really interesting highlights in the paper and we can certainly conclude that prebiotics do play a potential role in helping alleviate symptoms.
The paper starts with emphasizing the fact that the main factor in determining the quality and quantity of microbiota is diet. And we know that the microbiota is a fundamental regulator of both intestinal and brain health, and the immune system. We also know that inflammation is one of the critical processes underlying several neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder (MDD), Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and many others. Thus, the authors state, “…nutritional elements such as probiotics and prebiotics, could improve the host health due to their immunoregulatory properties.”
Probiotics and prebiotics that influence the brain are called psychobiotics. I first wrote about that new term way back in 2016 – see here. These can have anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) and anti-depressive effects, as well as altering cognition and emotions. This particular article reviewed what we currently have in terms of research on the effects of prebiotics, which, the authors state, “…may be useful as a potential therapeutic tool for cognitive impairment, anxiety and depression.”
A quick review: prebiotics refer to both digestible and non-digestible fibers that feed the microbiota. Many foods are rich sources including onions, garlic, bananas, asparagus, and more. Simply through eating a wide variety of fruits and vegetables, you are consuming a nice array of different prebiotics. We know that by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria, prebiotics help with the maintenance of the intestinal barrier and reduce circulating levels of inflammatory markers (including IL-6, TNF and c-reactive protein). They can directly prevent the invasion of pathogens by “…decreasing endothelial adhesion due to their anti-adhesive property.” I thought that was particularly interesting in light of that research I posted earlier this week, on a fungus that adheres to the inflamed and damaged tissue seen in Crohn’s disease, preventing wound healing. Finally, prebiotics promote the grown of bacteria that produce stress neuromodulators as well as short-chain fatty acids, about which you have read a lot on this blog. So, all in all, the right prebiotics have tremendous beneficial potential.
There are too many studies reviewed in the paper for me to go into them all so I’ll just give you a small sampling:
Unfortunately, clinical studies are “scarce.” Most, as you can see, are done on animals because of the overwhelming expense of human trials. Still, I hope this post gives at least some guidance and/or ideas to those of you who would like to add prebiotics to your daily regime.
[i] Paiva IHR, Duarte-Silva E, Peixoto CA. The role of prebiotics in cognition, anxiety, and depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 May;34:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 30. PMID: 32241688.
I was amazed by new research out of the Washington University in St. Louis done in conjunction with the Cleveland Clinic. Scientists discovered that a fungus called Debaryomyces hansenii, which is commonly used in the food industry to ripen the surfaces of cheese and processed meats, can latch on to injured and inflamed tissue in the intestines of patients with Crohn’s disease and causes the wounds to fester, leading to abdominal pain, diarrhea and bleeding.[i]
How was this discovery made? Using mice with intestinal injuries, the scientists attempted to find out why intestinal ulcers take so long to heal in people. They did DNA sequencing of the microbes found at the sites of these wounds and discovered that Debaryomyces hansenii is highly prevalent at that spot – but not at injured sites in the intestine. When they introduced this particular fungus into mice with intestinal injuries, they found it slowed down healing, and giving the animals antifungal medication (Amphotericin-B) killed the fungus and allowed the wounds to heal. This suggests, of course, that giving antifungals – along with dietary changes – may be a new way to promote wound healing in those with inflammatory bowel disease.
The researchers then looked at biopsies from 7 people with Crohn’s disease. They compared these samples to those from 10 healthy controls. All seven of the people with inflammatory bowel disease had the fungus in their gut tissue while only 1 healthy person did. They then looked at tissue samples from another 10 people with Crohn’s and found that the fungus was not only present, but was only found in inflamed tissue. The first author of this study says, “If you look at stool samples from healthy people, this fungus is highly abundant…It goes into your body and comes out again. But people with Crohn’s disease have a defect in the intestinal barrier that enables the fungus to get into the tissue and survive there. And then it makes itself at home in ulcers and sites of inflammation and prevents those areas from healing.”[ii]
We know from prior research that the mycobiome plays a (possibly major) role in Crohn’s disease. Back in 2017, in fact, I wrote about research that had just been presented at a conference in Chicago that showed that giving a yeast, C.tropicalis, (a normal part of the human mycobiome) to mice with Crohn’s markedly worsened the disease and adversely affected the composition of the bacterial microbiome.
Of course, before anyone makes any recommendations, this needs to be further studied in people. Firstly, is there a connection between the consumption of certain foods, the abundance of this fungus in the intestines, and then flare ups of Crohn’s? And can dietary modulation reduce the symptoms of Crohn’s disease? Treating this fungus likely won’t be a cure for IBD, but it certainly may help alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life for these patients. And you really do have to wonder what role the mycobiome plays in inflammatory bowel diseases.
[i] Jain, U, et. al. Debaryomyces is enriched inCrohn’s disease intestinal tissue and impairs healing in mice. Science. 2021. 371:6534(1154-1159). DOI: 10.1126/science.abd0919
Interesting new research on the relationship between the maternal microbiome and the immune system in infants was just published by in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science[i]. Using a mouse model, scientists from the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine found that the particular probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri is largely responsible for raising the level of IgA antibodies in pups.
Gut bacteria can translocate to the mammary gland via the lymph system and blood. Using a germ-free mouse model, the researchers found that “…Enrichment of certain maternal microbiota–derived bacterial taxa leads to early enhanced IgA production in the intestines, or what we refer to as IgA superinduction. In particular, L.reuteri was identified as a specific microbe derived from the maternal microbiota that colonizes the neonatal gastrointestinal tract to induce IgA.” It’s likely other bacteria do the same, but more research is needed to determine this.
IgA is produced mostly in the gut and is found at high levels there. It’s the most prevalent type of antibody in humans and is largely responsible for protecting us from enteric (gut) pathogens; supplementing with it may protect infants from infection. Because babies are born with only an innate immune system (the adaptive one – the one with memory, that involves antibodies to particular pathogens – develops over time), it’s important that they receive good immunity from their moms: “Infants are prone to enteric infections due to an underdeveloped immune system. The maternal microbiota, through shaping the neonatal microbiota, helps establish a strong immune system in infants.” One member of the research team states, “It’s not completely clear whether the observed immunological changes could affect autoimmune development, but if we can identify microbes that enhance early defenses without setting off self-reactivity, then we could potentially use them to protect infants from infections…”[ii]
Considering that L.reuteri seems to be pretty important as a potential probiotic for those with a wide variety of issues including autism, PTSD, and autoimmune diseases (look here and here, for just a couple of examples of posts on the topic), it may be highly significant that it plays such a critical role in the early formation of the immune system. In fact, you should really take the time to check out this post on the role L. reuteri may play in teaching the body immune tolerance (i.e. how to distinguish self from non-self, and pathogen from not-pathogen). I have to believe this is somehow all related.
In fact, in one of those coincidences that I love so much, as I was writing this post, I saw an article on using probiotics to increase intestinal diversity in preterm babies.[iii] These babies often suffer from life-threatening inflammation of the gut called necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which leads to the death of parts of the intestine – and often the death of the baby. Prior research had shown that L. reuteri can reduce the risk of NEC in moderately preterm babies, and now, researchers in Sweden found that it can do the same in extremely preterm infants, born between 23 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. They tested this in 132 babies, none of whom weighed more than a kilogram (about 2 pounds), and found that those who received the probiotic (as opposed to the placebo) were less likely to be infected by pathogenic bacteria like Klebsiella an Staphyloccus, which can lead to NEC. At this point, the evidence is strong enough that probiotics are now fairly routinely given to preterm infants. L. reuteri just seems like a pretty good idea for moms and their new babies.